fix: remediate 2026 Interfold contracts security audit [skip-line-limit]#1727
Draft
hmzakhalid wants to merge 35 commits into
Draft
fix: remediate 2026 Interfold contracts security audit [skip-line-limit]#1727hmzakhalid wants to merge 35 commits into
hmzakhalid wants to merge 35 commits into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This was referenced Jul 15, 2026
Closed
This was referenced Jul 15, 2026
Closed
hmzakhalid
force-pushed
the
fix/contracts-security-audit-20260715
branch
from
July 15, 2026 17:25
7303a5f to
740286a
Compare
hmzakhalid
force-pushed
the
fix/contracts-security-audit-20260715
branch
from
July 17, 2026 12:19
5fd9315 to
cab0677
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
skip_proof_aggregationis a ciphernode-only test/CI flag, defaults off, and supplies mock-only non-empty placeholders while production verifiers remain mandatorySecurity and protocol decisions to review
Fixed findings
Critical
590c425ed724131c112eb755High
d858ae36,db32219373826ad8b124f06e,ecb4acb4Medium
79ba4e8f,99545842593fcfb666735a2f19fd9e75,e8000792e1c6d3d9,a72a5bea1f5f57a9df5c5802Low
cf7e9d0da9a337ef6983f8f0Validation
Issue resolution
Closes #1708
Closes #1709
Closes #1710
Closes #1711
Closes #1712
Closes #1714
Closes #1716
Closes #1717
Closes #1718
Closes #1719
Closes #1720
Closes #1721
Closes #1722
Closes #1723
Closes #1724
Closes #1726