Solution#2164
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your solution meets all functional requirements and tests are passing. The implementation correctly splits integers according to the specification. There's one minor style note: in test_sum_of_the_parts_should_be_equal_to_value(), storing the result in a variable before asserting follows the pattern in other tests but per [CHECKLIST ITEM #1], simple direct assertions like assert split_integer.split_integer(17, 4) == [4, 4, 4, 5] are preferred when testing straightforward outputs. This is a cosmetic improvement rather than a functional issue—your code works correctly and demonstrates good test coverage overall.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| def test_sum_of_the_parts_should_be_equal_to_value() -> None: | ||
| pass | ||
| result = split_integer.split_integer(17, 4) | ||
|
|
||
| assert sum(result) == 17 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Checklist item #1 violation: This stores the result in a variable before asserting. For simple tests, compare the function result directly: assert split_integer.split_integer(17, 4) == [4, 4, 4, 5]
2 participants
No description provided.