Skip to content

⚙️ [Maintenance]: Fix Docs Lint pipeline (MD060 tables + codespell false positives) #52

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Marius Storhaug (MariusStorhaug) merged 2 commits into from
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

⚙️ [Maintenance]: Fix Docs Lint pipeline (MD060 tables + codespell false positives) #52

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
89b7a0d
Pad table delimiter rows to satisfy MD060 table-column-style
MariusStorhaug Jul 1, 2026
aecf275
Ignore codespell false positives for the Skelton surname and SPACE ac…
MariusStorhaug Jul 1, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .github/linters/.codespellrc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
[codespell]
skip = ./.github/linters
ignore-words-list = afterall
ignore-words-list = afterall,skelton,erformance
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions src/docs/Ways-of-Working/continuous-x-and-continuous-ai.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
The cleanest authoritative taxonomy. From [DevOps Dojo White Belt Foundation](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/paths/devops-dojo-white-belt-foundation/):

| # | Practice | What it covers |
|---|----------|----------------|
| --- | ---------- | ---------------- |
| 1 | Continuous Planning | Lean product, hypothesis-driven dev, backlog management, OKRs |
| 2 | Continuous Integration | Trunk-based dev, automated build & test on every commit |
| 3 | Continuous Delivery | Every commit potentially releasable; automated pipeline to prod |
Expand All @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ The cleanest authoritative taxonomy. From [DevOps Dojo White Belt Foundation](ht
### Full inventory with provenance

| Practice | Origin / canonical source |
|----------|--------------------------|
| ---------- | -------------------------- |
| **Continuous Integration** | Coined in Grady Booch's 1991 method; popularised by XP and [Martin Fowler's 2006 article](https://martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html). |
| **Continuous Delivery** | Jez Humble & David Farley, [*Continuous Delivery*](https://continuousdelivery.com/), 2010. |
| **Continuous Deployment** | Every passing build deploys to prod with no human gate (vs. CD which only makes it *deployable*). |
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Continuous AI tasks are: **automatable, repetitive, collaborative, integrated, a
### Continuous AI vs. its cousins

| Term | What it is |
|------|-----------|
| ------ | ----------- |
| **Continuous AI** | AI participating *in* the SDLC continuously (review, docs, triage, fault analysis). The AI is the actor. |
| **MLOps** | CI/CD/CT *for* ML models — training, evaluation, deployment, monitoring. The model is the product. |
| **LLMOps** | MLOps specialised for LLM apps: prompt versioning, evals, retrieval, guardrails, cost/latency monitoring. |
Expand All @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Continuous AI tasks are: **automatable, repetitive, collaborative, integrated, a
### How Continuous AI augments each Continuous X practice

| Traditional practice | Continuous-AI augmentation | Example tools (2025) |
|---------------------|---------------------------|----------------------|
| --------------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| Continuous Integration | AI summarises broken builds; suggests fixes | GitHub Copilot Workspace, Sweep |
| Continuous Delivery | Agents drive multi-step deploys; AI-authored release notes | GitHub Copilot agents, Devin |
| Continuous Testing | Test generation, flaky-test detection, auto-repair | Diffblue, Qodo (CodiumAI), Meta TestGen-LLM |
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/docs/Ways-of-Working/devops-reference.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ A curated synthesis of authoritative sources, frameworks, and practices.
### The Canon (Books)

| # | Title | Author(s) | Year | Why it matters |
|---|-------|-----------|------|----------------|
| --- | ------- | ----------- | ------ | ---------------- |
| 1 | **The Phoenix Project** | Gene Kim, Kevin Behr, George Spafford | 2013 | The novel that introduced DevOps to mainstream. Source of the Three Ways. [itrevolution.com/product/the-phoenix-project](https://itrevolution.com/product/the-phoenix-project/) |
| 2 | **The Unicorn Project** | Gene Kim | 2019 | Sequel from the developer's perspective; flow state, psychological safety, Five Ideals. |
| 3 | **The DevOps Handbook** (2nd ed.) | Gene Kim, Jez Humble, Patrick Debois, John Willis | 2016/2021 | Practical companion to Phoenix Project. The reference implementation guide. |
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ All available at **[sre.google/books](https://sre.google/books/)**
The evidence-based standard for DevOps performance. Source: Forsgren/Humble/Kim research, now part of Google Cloud.

| Metric | What it measures | Elite performance |
|--------|------------------|-------------------|
| -------- | ------------------ | ------------------- |
| **Deployment Frequency** | How often you deploy to prod | Multiple per day / on-demand |
| **Lead Time for Changes** | Commit → production | < 1 hour |
| **Change Failure Rate** | % of deploys causing problems | 0–15% |
Expand Down