Skip to content

Execute owned RowFn outputs over valid rows - #9500

Merged
connortsui20 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
ct/row-fn-owned-valid-rows
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

Execute owned RowFn outputs over valid rows#9500
connortsui20 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
ct/row-fn-owned-valid-rows

Execute owned RowFn outputs over valid rows

d56d815
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Aug 20, 2026

1 benchmark regressed

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1953 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 442 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation chunked_varbinview_opt_into_canonical[(10, 100)] 592.2 µs 660.3 µs -10.31%
Simulation take[duplicates/repeated/primitive/nonnull/chunks=16/indices=1000] 270.5 µs 228.9 µs +18.19%
Simulation compress_fsst[(500, 64, 4)] 517.2 µs 467.6 µs +10.61%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ct/row-fn-owned-valid-rows (d56d815) with develop (ae156bf)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 442 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on develop (cb77d9a) during the generation of this report, so ae156bf was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.