Implement RowFn row execution - #9353
Performance Regression: -12.34%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
❌ 7 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1993 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 89 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=1024/indices=1000] |
5.7 ms | 6.6 ms | -14.2% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=1024/indices=256] |
2.2 ms | 2.5 ms | -13.6% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=16384/indices=1000] |
9.6 ms | 11 ms | -12.95% |
| ❌ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)] |
1 ms | 1.2 ms | -12.2% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take[core/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=1024/indices=10000] |
14.3 ms | 16.2 ms | -11.87% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=1024/indices=16] |
278.6 µs | 312.8 µs | -10.94% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=16384/indices=256] |
3.2 ms | 3.5 ms | -10.54% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/row-fn-framework (d65a9da) with develop (42a72d9)
Footnotes
-
89 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩