Skip to content

merge#30

Open
Abdulmuiz44 wants to merge 84 commits into
codex/nextauth-google-auth-flowfrom
main
Open

merge#30
Abdulmuiz44 wants to merge 84 commits into
codex/nextauth-google-auth-flowfrom
main

Conversation

@Abdulmuiz44

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

Abdulmuiz44 and others added 23 commits April 8, 2026 00:07
…nchpix-mvp

Codex/build foundation for launchpix mvp
…nchpix-mvp

Relax project website URL validation
…nchpix-mvp

Redesign app UI with sleek shadcn style
…unchpix-mvp

Refine landing page structure and CTAs
…unchpix-mvp

Harden dashboard runtime and prevent client-side crash
…unchpix-mvp

Clean up LaunchPix dashboard layout
…unchpix-mvp

Stabilize LaunchPix generation flow
…n-fix

Improve design system and generation fallback
…n-fix

[codex] Create professional LaunchPix demo video
…n-fix

[codex] Polish responsive dashboard sidebar
…n-fix

[codex] Tighten dashboard header and generation layout
…n-fix

[codex] Refine professional dark interface
…n-fix

Codex/design system generation fix
…me-refresh

Improve frontend conversion layout and theme
…me-refresh

Add LaunchPix logo and richer preview visuals
…me-refresh

Codex/frontend conversion theme refresh
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for launchpix failed.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0f00256
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/launchpix/deploys/6a3963e3ccdc1100086f09db

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3f4e3ab513

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread app/api/billing/checkout/route.ts Outdated
Comment on lines +40 to +41
if (message.includes("is not configured")) {
return NextResponse.json({ error: message }, { status: 500 });

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Stop exposing internal config errors to checkout clients

The new "is not configured" branch returns the raw exception text to the browser, which can leak internal environment variable names (for example missing LEMON_SQUEEZY_* keys) to any authenticated user triggering checkout. This is a security disclosure regression compared with the previous generic 500 response and should be replaced with a sanitized user-facing message while keeping full details only in server logs.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Test and others added 2 commits April 29, 2026 16:44
Abdulmuiz44 and others added 30 commits June 9, 2026 23:06
Implement billing verification state
PR 1 of async migration: extract create, billing, planner, renderer,
storage, and finalize modules from runner.ts. No behavior change.
…aries

refactor(generations): split generation runner boundaries
Day 12 / PR 2 of async migration foundation:
- generation status contract and public response mapper
- conditional worker claim helper (queued -> analyzing)
- GET /api/v1/projects/[projectId]/generations/[generationId]
- unit tests for claim, status mapping, and project scoping

No async execution, queue, or 202 response changes.
Day 13 / PR 3 of async migration: POST /generate returns 202 Accepted
with generationId, queued status, and poll URL. Durable enqueue via
generations row + usage_events audit trail. No worker execution yet.
Create async submissions as draft, consume credit, then promote to
queued and mark the project queued before enqueue returns 202.
Prevents workers from claiming unpaid generations and keeps project
list status aligned with accepted jobs.
feat(generations): enqueue generation requests
Keep split generation runner modules and integrate main logging.
Fix docs typed-route links and align generate API docs with 202 enqueue.
Addresses Codex P1 on PR #48: async 202 acceptance no longer ships without
a runtime processor. v1 POST runs runGenerationForProject (201) by default;
LAUNCHPIX_ASYNC_GENERATION enables 202 enqueue with claim-based worker via
POST /api/internal/worker/generations/process or inline when configured.
…foundation

Feat/generation worker contract foundation
Wire production-safe cron processing for queued generations: worker secret
auth, batch worker endpoint, Render cron job, npm worker script, and ops docs.
Default sync POST behavior and inline dev mode are unchanged.
feat(generations): add async worker trigger
Replace platform-wide LAUNCHPIX_API_KEY + x-launchpix-user-id with
per-customer api_keys authentication on public /api/v1 routes. Credits
are reserved once at POST with generationId/apiKeyId ledger events;
worker processing remains LAUNCHPIX_WORKER_SECRET only.
fix(api): enforce customer api key billing for generation
Replace mock API key UI with session-authenticated create/list/revoke
routes. Plaintext keys are returned once at creation; list exposes
metadata only. Dashboard setup banner uses real active key state.
Return 404 for malformed project IDs instead of surfacing Supabase UUID
cast errors as 500s, and roll back reserved credits when usage_events
ledger inserts fail so billing stays consistent.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant