feat: token-verifier: Support Solana format for Lombard - #1366
Open
archseer wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
👋 archseer, thanks for creating this pull request! To help reviewers, please consider creating future PRs as drafts first. This allows you to self-review and make any final changes before notifying the team. Once you're ready, you can mark it as "Ready for review" to request feedback. Thanks! |
archseer
changed the title
archseer
force-pushed
the
solana-lombard
branch
from
August 20, 2026 06:15
0906548 to
137f512
Compare
|
Code coverage report:
|
archseer
enabled auto-merge
August 20, 2026 06:42
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On Solana, it's a two step process where Lombard already delivers and verifies the proofs into a mailbox out of band, and we only need to use the
payloadHashto retrieve them. The old approach would receive the whole payload and recompute the payloadHash onchain, but there's no need for that: we can just trim down the payload to only contain the payloadHash when the destination is SVM.