Update documentation with 6 changed files (#4731) - #4743
Conversation
Automatic checkpoint to preserve work in progress. Tests and implementation saved before refactoring phase.
…ry loop Evaluate is_broken_pipe(&e) once per error branch instead of twice, binding it to `broken` for the retriable gate and the exhausted-metric guard. Pure DRY simplification; behavior unchanged. All gates green (fmt, 73 memory_ipc tests, clippy --all-targets). Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Step 17b — Comprehensive Code Review (issue #4731 memory-IPC write-path resilience)Verdict: APPROVE. Independently re-verified all gates green; no blocking findings. Verification (re-run in this review, not just claimed)
Checklist
Logic correctness — key points validated
Non-blocking observations (optional; no change required)
Conclusion: Implementation is correct, complete, well-tested, and philosophy-compliant (surgical edits, fail-closed, no silent fallback). Ready to merge. |
Step 17c — Security Review (issue #4731 memory-IPC write-path resilience)Verdict: PASS — no security-blocking findings. Reviewed the actual PR diff (6 files: Checklist
Security-relevant strengths
Non-blocking observations (defense-in-depth, no change required)
Independently re-verified gates green (fmt, clippy |
Step 17d — Philosophy Guardian Review (issue #4731 memory-IPC write-path resilience)Verdict: PASS. Independently read the full PR diff ( Compliance checklist
Additional philosophy-relevant strengths
One benign, non-blocking observation
Implementation is correct, minimal, and philosophy-aligned. Approved from a philosophy-compliance standpoint. |
📊 Coverage Summary
Coverage data from CI run. Test files matching |
|
Auto-closing this stale CONFLICTING auto-generated documentation draft: it can no longer merge cleanly and is superseded by the canonical open auto-doc PR #4826. Enforcing the single-open auto-doc PR invariant (goal_hygiene). |
Summary
Concise workflow-generated PR for documentation.
Issue
Closes #4731
Changed files
Diff stat
Behavior
Implemented behavior through these branch commits:
4702de9 refactor(memory-ipc): hoist duplicate broken-pipe check in call() retry loop
2817268 wip: checkpoint after implementation (steps 7-8)
Validation
ℹ NODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=32768 (saved preference). To change: /home/azureuser/.amplihack/config
I'll start by checking the current state of the branch and changes.
● Get branch, status, and diff stat (shell)
│ cd /home/azureuser/src/Simard-deploy-4049/worktrees/feat/issue-4731-fix-a-recurring-systemic-pro
│ cess-health-defect-in && git branch --show-current && echo "---STATUS---" && git --no-pager
│ status && echo "---DIFF STAT---" && git --no-pager diff --stat HEAD
└ 9 lines…
● Show recent commits and changed files (shell)
│ cd /home/azureuser/src/Simard-deploy-4049/worktrees/feat/issue-4731-fix-a-recurring-systemic-pro
│ cess-health-defect-in && git --no-pager log --oneline -5 && echo "---CHANGED FILES vs origin
Risk
No high-risk subsystem pattern detected from changed paths.
Checklist
This PR was created as a draft for review before merging.
Step 16b: Outside-In Testing Results
Detected toolchain: Rust CLI crate (
Cargo.toml+Cargo.lockat root);cargo 1.95.0/rustc 1.95.0. Package manager: cargo. No JS/Python/Go manifests. Outside-in boundary = nativecargo test(per qa-team Rust-CLI mapping).Changed surface under test:
src/memory_ipc/client.rs,src/memory_ipc/mod.rs, and the focused regression suitesrc/memory_ipc/tests_epipe_resilience_4731.rs.Chosen strategy: Run the crate's own outside-in/consumer-boundary tests via
cargo test --lib. An isolatedCARGO_TARGET_DIR=/tmp/simard-4731-targetwas used to avoid target-dir contention with concurrent worktree builds on the shared host. Ran one simple scenario (fullmemory_ipcmodule) and one edge/integration scenario (mid-write peer-reset resilience).RpcTransportError(never silent Ok); non-Pong reconnect aborts without resending; surfaced error never leaks payload bytescargo test --lib memory_ipc::tests_epipe_resilience_4731 -- --nocapturetest result: ok. 4 passed; 0 failed(mid_write_reset_reconnects_and_delivers_payload, persistent_reset_surfaces_rpc_transport_error_never_silent, non_pong_reconnect_aborts_without_resending_payload, surfaced_error_never_leaks_payload_bytes)cargo test --lib memory_ipctest result: ok. 73 passed; 0 failedNo-silent-drop verification:
persistent_reset_surfaces_rpc_transport_error_never_silentconfirms an exhausted retry surfacesSimardError::RpcTransportErrorrather than a silentOk;mid_write_reset_reconnects_and_delivers_payloadconfirms a large frame is durably delivered after reconnect. New code uses structuredtracing(warn/debug/error/info) only — grep confirms noprint!/println!added.Fix count: 0 (both scenarios passed on first run; no diagnose/fix/push iterations required).