Bump bootstrap to 1.98 beta#158888
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
4f5f973 to
8e98714
Compare
|
cc @rust-lang/miri
cc @Amanieu, @folkertdev, @sayantn Some changes occurred in integer formatting cc @tgross35 |
|
r? @JohnTitor rustbot has assigned @JohnTitor. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
|
@bors p=6 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test for 2d0b8c5 failed: CI. Failed job:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Does this reproduce? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Bump bootstrap to 1.98 beta try-job: dist-i686-msvc
|
OK, so I think if the Cargo side doesn't materialize quickly we can still land (most) of the bootstrap bump here. The last commit (9532156 as of writing) swaps out the Cargo used by CI on i686 Windows builders so we're not affected by the bug (or the fixes). I'm not sure that's actually worth it, though, and it would break anyone building locally unless they apply a similar change. My sense is we can evaluate that choice over the next week depending on how the Cargo PR progresses. |
|
I guess we need this beta bump first? #159182 |
9532156 to
4225f7f
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Bump bootstrap to 1.98 beta try-job: *i686*
|
This pull request was unapproved. |
|
@bors p=6 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test for f9b9d8d failed: CI. Failed job:
|
Does not seem spurious |
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
Hmm… looks like still the new build dir layout issue. @ranger-ross mind taking a look? I'll investigate as well later today. |
See #158873 (comment). Look like some rustc wrappers haven't yet prepared for the new build dir layout. |
View all comments
https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#default-branch-bootstrap-update-and-crater-tuesday