Skip to content

fix: update references after the linear-cli-ex -> linear-cli repo rename - #2

Merged
bougyman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-linear-cli-ex-references
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

fix: update references after the linear-cli-ex -> linear-cli repo rename#2
bougyman merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-linear-cli-ex-references

Conversation

@bougyman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • homepage, both release download URLs, and the README link all still pointed at the old rubyists/linear-cli-ex repo name.
  • Verified both download URLs actually resolve at the new rubyists/linear-cli path and their sha256 checksums are unchanged (downloaded lc_linux_x86_64.tar.gz fresh and re-hashed).

Part of rubyists/linear-cli#80.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

homepage, both release download URLs, and the README link all pointed
at the old repo name. Verified both download URLs actually resolve at
the new path and their sha256 checksums are unchanged.
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 12, 2026 13:48

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates this tap’s references to the lc upstream repository after it was renamed from rubyists/linear-cli-ex to rubyists/linear-cli, ensuring users and the formula metadata point at the correct GitHub project and release assets.

Changes:

  • Update README link to the renamed rubyists/linear-cli repository.
  • Update formula homepage and release asset URLs to the renamed repository.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
Readme.adoc Updates the upstream GitHub link to the renamed repository.
Formula/lc.rb Updates homepage and release download URLs to the renamed repository.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@bougyman
bougyman merged commit 00bcb47 into main Aug 12, 2026
1 check passed
@bougyman
bougyman deleted the fix-linear-cli-ex-references branch August 12, 2026 13:50
bougyman added a commit to rubyists/linear-cli that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
…-cli -> linear-cli-rb repo renames (#81)

## Summary
Closes #80. Local remotes were already fixed separately (this repo's
`origin`, and `vendor/ruby-linear-cli`'s remote in both `.gitmodules`
and its own checked-out git config). This is everything else that
hardcoded the old names:

- `install.sh`/`uninstall.sh`: `repo=` URL and `state_dir` (renamed now,
not kept for backward compat - real installs against the old name are
minimal, the tool shipped its first release only a day ago).
- `Readme.adoc`: 9 occurrences, plus one the blind rename would have
gotten backwards - the "port of Ruby's linear-cli" link needs to point
at `linear-cli-rb` now, not this repo. Left the 4 plain-prose "Ruby's
`linear-cli`" mentions alone.
- `.github/workflows/main.yaml`: the `container` job's temp tarball
filename (cosmetic only).
- `vendor/rubyists-homebrew-tap`: bumped to the commit fixing its own
homepage/download URLs (rubyists/homebrew-tap#2).

`CHANGELOG.md`'s historical release-please-generated links are
deliberately left untouched - see #80 for why.

## Test plan
- [x] Ran a full `install.sh`/`uninstall.sh` round-trip against the
renamed `state_dir` - the release download also resolves correctly at
the new repo path
- [x] Verified via the Ruby repo's own gemspec (`spec.name =
'linear-cli'`) that the 4 plain-prose "Ruby's `linear-cli`" mentions are
still accurate and shouldn't change - only its GitHub repo got renamed
- [x] Verified GitHub's repo-rename redirect works
(`github.com/rubyists/linear-cli-ex` -> `linear-cli`) so nothing was
broken pre-fix, just stale
- [x] `actionlint` clean on `main.yaml`
- [x] Homebrew formula's release URLs re-verified against the new repo
path (downloaded fresh, sha256 unchanged)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants