chore(bulk-import): promote bulk-import from alpha to stable

[divyanshiGupta]

Hey, I just made a Pull Request!

https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/RHIDP-14360

Graduated the New Frontend System (NFS) plugin to the primary entry point.

The main . export now only contains NFS APIs (createFrontendPlugin, bulkImportTranslationsModule, translations). Legacy (OFS) component re-exports (bulkImportPlugin, BulkImportPage, BulkImportSidebarItem, BulkImportIcon) have been moved to the ./legacy subpath.

Screen.Recording.2026-07-21.at.11.23.57.AM.mov

✔️ Checklist

• A changeset describing the change and affected packages. (more info)
• Added or Updated documentation
• Tests for new functionality and regression tests for bug fixes
• Screenshots attached (for UI changes)

[rhdh-gh-app]

Important

This PR includes changes that affect public-facing API. Please ensure you are adding/updating documentation for new features or behavior.

Changed Packages

Package Name	Package Path	Changeset Bump	Current Version
app-legacy	workspaces/bulk-import/packages/app-legacy	none	v0.0.3
app	workspaces/bulk-import/packages/app	none	v0.0.1
@red-hat-developer-hub/backstage-plugin-bulk-import	workspaces/bulk-import/plugins/bulk-import	major	v7.3.7

[divyanshiGupta]

There is a issue I am facing wherein the CI expects the api-report in a certain format and if formatted using prettier gives api report error. On the otherhand it also shows prettier error if api-report is in the same format it expects.

Run yarn tsc:full && yarn build:all && yarn build:api-reports:only, and you will see the api report is updated

Yeah tried that multiple times. But it is stuck in that api reports/prettier error cycle. Will try again.

[debsmita1]

There is a issue I am facing wherein the CI expects the api-report in a certain format and if formatted using prettier gives api report error. On the otherhand it also shows prettier error if api-report is in the same format it expects.

Run yarn tsc:full && yarn build:all && yarn build:api-reports:only, and you will see the api report is updated

Yeah tried that multiple times. But it is stuck in that api reports/prettier error cycle. Will try again.

I tried it locally with your changes, it updated the report-legacy.api.md file

[debsmita1]

Tested this in RHDH with the help of redhat-developer/rhdh#5115

The icon in the light theme needs to be fixed

[divyanshiGupta]

There is a issue I am facing wherein the CI expects the api-report in a certain format and if formatted using prettier gives api report error. On the otherhand it also shows prettier error if api-report is in the same format it expects.

Run yarn tsc:full && yarn build:all && yarn build:api-reports:only, and you will see the api report is updated

Yeah tried that multiple times. But it is stuck in that api reports/prettier error cycle. Will try again.

I tried it locally with your changes, it updated the report-legacy.api.md file

yeah it does. the issue was ci prettier is not accepting what ci api-reports builder requires. anyways i have added these files in .prettierignore so ci shouldnt prettier on these files anymore.

[divyanshiGupta]

There is a issue I am facing wherein the CI expects the api-report in a certain format and if formatted using prettier gives api report error. On the otherhand it also shows prettier error if api-report is in the same format it expects.

Run yarn tsc:full && yarn build:all && yarn build:api-reports:only, and you will see the api report is updated

Yeah tried that multiple times. But it is stuck in that api reports/prettier error cycle. Will try again.

I tried it locally with your changes, it updated the report-legacy.api.md file

yeah it does. the issue was ci prettier is not accepting what ci api-reports builder requires. anyways i have added these files in .prettierignore so ci shouldnt prettier on these files anymore.

@debsmita1 I am talking about this https://github.com/redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins/actions/runs/29830489936/job/88633851082?pr=3716. If I now format it then the ci api-reports builder will give error. Not sure why prettier is still running on the api-reports as they are now in .pettierignore though.

[divyanshiGupta]

The icon in the light theme needs to be fixed

@debsmita1 is the issue only in this PR or main as well? Since this PR just promotes the ./alpha subpath to the primary . entry point so shouldnt really affect the icon theme colors. Also I dont see this issue while running in the plugin workspace.

[debsmita1]

The icon in the light theme needs to be fixed

@debsmita1 is the issue only in this PR? Since this PR just promotes the ./alpha subpath to the primary . entry point so shouldnt really affect the icon theme colors. Also I dont see this issue while running in the plugin workspace.

I haven't been able to start the rhdh with the bulk-import backend as I am running into errors. But yea, any UI issues can be addressed in a separate ticket

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.34%. Comparing base (9a3c742) to head (f611851).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3716      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.34%   57.34%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2381     2382       +1     
  Lines       95582    95586       +4     
  Branches    26694    26697       +3     
==========================================
  Hits        54811    54811              
- Misses      39312    39316       +4     
  Partials     1459     1459              

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
adoption-insights	84.54% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
ai-integrations	69.06% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
app-defaults	69.79% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
augment	46.67% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
boost	75.83% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
bulk-import	72.55% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️
cost-management	13.55% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
dcm	60.72% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
extensions	56.29% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
global-floating-action-button	71.18% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
global-header	62.17% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
homepage	47.70% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
install-dynamic-plugins	56.77% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
intelligent-assistant	74.05% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
konflux	91.98% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
lightspeed	69.02% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
mcp-integrations	83.40% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
orchestrator	62.67% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
quickstart	65.04% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
sandbox	79.56% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
scorecard	82.63% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
theme	83.85% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
translations	5.12% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742
x2a	79.31% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 9a3c742

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9a3c742...f611851. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[debsmita1]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud