Skip to content

Emissions inputs - #3474

Open
robindesmit-quintel wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
emissions-inputs
Open

Emissions inputs#3474
robindesmit-quintel wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
emissions-inputs

Conversation

@robindesmit-quintel

@robindesmit-quintel robindesmit-quintel commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Context

To implement the direct emission method in the ETM, we need to create inputs in ETsource which retrieve the co2 emissions from sliders in the frontend.

Implemented changes

Creating new input files for the direct emissions.

Related

Closes issue ...

Goes with pull requests ...

Checklist

  • I have tested these changes
  • I have updated documentation as needed
  • I have tagged the relevant people for review

kndehaan and others added 6 commits August 19, 2026 13:57
Required to go before development of demand sliders. Both were set to priority 0, and this went ok due to alphabetical order, but risky and prone to future errors if input names are changed. Updating the priority ensures that the correct order is maintained. Does not change anything to the results.
@kndehaan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mabijkerk could you review and test the changes related to international transport in these two commits: a1fd484, 82e7897.

These inputs are connected and I updated one of the priorities. Note that the user value for the emissions slider is corrected for the share of international transport that is accounted for. This is also a user instruction that we should communicate to the client.

@kndehaan
kndehaan self-requested a review August 20, 2026 14:50

@kndehaan kndehaan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work! I only improved the LULUCF co2 slider since the nodes weren't updated properly for all use cases. This is now fixed. Only awaiting @mabijkerk review of the bunkers sliders now.

@kndehaan
kndehaan requested a review from mabijkerk August 20, 2026 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants