OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA by skopacz1 · Pull Request #115222 · openshift/openshift-docs

skopacz1 · 2026-07-13T18:07:58Z

Version(s): 4.20+

CQA for two node cluster install docs.

QE review: not required IMO but let me know if you see anything that makes you disagree.

Previews:

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-07-13T18:08:02Z

@skopacz1: This pull request references OSDOCS-17034 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

ocpdocs-previewbot · 2026-07-13T18:17:14Z

🤖 Tue Jul 21 15:24:08 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://115222--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/installing/installing_two_node_cluster/about-two-node-arbiter-installation.html
https://115222--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/installing-two-node-fencing.html
https://115222--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/install-post-tnf.html
https://115222--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/install-tnf.html

lahinson

@skopacz1 Just a couple questions for you, but nothing that would block merging. Marking as ok-to-merge.

lahinson · 2026-07-20T19:04:02Z

@@ -1,19 +1,21 @@
 :_mod-docs-content-type: ASSEMBLY
 [id="about-two-node-arbiter-installation"]
 = Two-Node with Arbiter


I don't know anything about Arbiter, so forgive my ignorance. Should it be capitalized here? Looks like it's lowercase in the body text.

Genuinely unsure of this myself, I think I will just leave it as is and save it for the quality pass of CQAs later

lahinson · 2026-07-20T19:07:23Z

+= Minimum resource requirements for installing a two-node OpenShift cluster with fencing
+
+[role="_abstract"]
+Each created cluster must meet minimum requirements so that the cluster runs as expected.


Suggested change

Each created cluster must meet minimum requirements so that the cluster runs as expected.

Each cluster must meet minimum requirements so that the cluster runs as expected.

Just a nit. If there's a good reason to include the "created", feel free to ignore me.

lahinson · 2026-07-20T19:08:54Z

Should this be a REFERENCE?

Yeah I can see the case for that, I will change it here

lahinson · 2026-07-20T19:10:43Z

Should "none" be none? I know this isn't part of your proposed changes here, but I saw this in the preview, and it caught my attention.

Yes that should probably be in backticks, good catch!

ocpdocs-vale-bot · 2026-07-21T15:25:44Z

 ----

-* `platform.baremetal.apiVIPs` and `ingressVIPs`: Specifies virtual IPs for the API and Ingress endpoints. Required for bare-metal platform; not applicable for none.
+* `platform.baremetal.apiVIPs` and `ingressVIPs`: Specifies virtual IPs for the API and Ingress endpoints. Required for bare-metal platform; not applicable for `none`.


🤖 [error] RedHat.TermsErrors: Use 'bare metal' rather than 'bare-metal'. For more information, see RedHat.TermsErrors.

openshift-ci · 2026-07-21T15:26:19Z

@skopacz1: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

skopacz1 · 2026-07-21T15:58:40Z

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

skopacz1 · 2026-07-21T15:58:43Z

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

skopacz1 · 2026-07-21T15:58:50Z

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22
/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-07-21T15:59:38Z

@skopacz1: #115222 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.20":

Applying: OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	installing/installing_two_node_cluster/about-two-node-arbiter-installation.adoc
M	installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/install-post-tnf.adoc
M	installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/installing-two-node-fencing.adoc
M	modules/installation-replacing-control-plane-nodes.adoc
M	modules/installation-two-node-cluster-min-resource-reqs.adoc
A	modules/sample-install-config-two-node-fencing-abi.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging installing/installing_two_node_cluster/about-two-node-arbiter-installation.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in installing/installing_two_node_cluster/about-two-node-arbiter-installation.adoc
Auto-merging installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/install-post-tnf.adoc
Auto-merging installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/installing-two-node-fencing.adoc
Auto-merging modules/installation-replacing-control-plane-nodes.adoc
Auto-merging modules/installation-two-node-cluster-min-resource-reqs.adoc
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/sample-install-config-two-node-fencing-abi.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA.  Version OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA of modules/sample-install-config-two-node-fencing-abi.adoc left in tree.
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-07-21T15:59:41Z

@skopacz1: #115222 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.21":

Patch is empty.
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To record the empty patch as an empty commit, run "git am --allow-empty".
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-07-21T15:59:51Z

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #115972

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22
/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

skopacz1 · 2026-07-21T16:00:40Z

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-07-21T16:00:41Z

@skopacz1: new pull request created: #115977

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22
/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-07-21T16:01:26Z

@skopacz1: #115222 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.21":

Applying: OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	installing/installing_two_node_cluster/about-two-node-arbiter-installation.adoc
M	installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/install-post-tnf.adoc
M	installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/installing-two-node-fencing.adoc
M	modules/installation-replacing-control-plane-nodes.adoc
M	modules/installation-two-node-cluster-min-resource-reqs.adoc
A	modules/sample-install-config-two-node-fencing-abi.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging installing/installing_two_node_cluster/about-two-node-arbiter-installation.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in installing/installing_two_node_cluster/about-two-node-arbiter-installation.adoc
Auto-merging installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/install-post-tnf.adoc
Auto-merging installing/installing_two_node_cluster/installing_tnf/installing-two-node-fencing.adoc
Auto-merging modules/installation-replacing-control-plane-nodes.adoc
Auto-merging modules/installation-two-node-cluster-min-resource-reqs.adoc
CONFLICT (modify/delete): modules/sample-install-config-two-node-fencing-abi.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA.  Version OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA of modules/sample-install-config-two-node-fencing-abi.adoc left in tree.
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 13, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 13, 2026

skopacz1 added merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR branch/enterprise-4.20 branch/enterprise-4.21 branch/enterprise-4.22 branch/enterprise-5.0 labels Jul 14, 2026

skopacz1 added this to the Continuous Release milestone Jul 14, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 17, 2026

skopacz1 force-pushed the OSDOCS-17034 branch from 6652da7 to 79cecbd Compare July 17, 2026 13:52

openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 17, 2026

lahinson added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 20, 2026

lahinson reviewed Jul 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

lahinson added ok-to-merge and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR labels Jul 20, 2026

OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA

1f60d1e

skopacz1 force-pushed the OSDOCS-17034 branch from 79cecbd to 1f60d1e Compare July 21, 2026 15:09

ocpdocs-vale-bot reviewed Jul 21, 2026

View reviewed changes

skopacz1 merged commit 2265c83 into openshift:main Jul 21, 2026
2 checks passed

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2026

[enterprise-4.22] OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA #115972

Merged

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2026

[enterprise-5.0] OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA #115977

Merged

This was referenced Jul 21, 2026

[enterprise-4.20] OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA #115985

Merged

[enterprise-4.21] OSDOCS-17034: two node OCP CQA #115988

Merged

	Each created cluster must meet minimum requirements so that the cluster runs as expected.
	Each cluster must meet minimum requirements so that the cluster runs as expected.

Uh oh!

Conversation

skopacz1 commented Jul 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 13, 2026 • edited by openshift-ci Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

lahinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

skopacz1 commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

skopacz1 commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

skopacz1 commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

skopacz1 commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Jul 21, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

skopacz1 commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited by openshift-ci Bot

Loading

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading