Skip to content

Fix for OCPBUGS-89698: CVE-2026-12143#1053

Open
rhdmalone wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.22from
rhdmalone:release-4.22
Open

Fix for OCPBUGS-89698: CVE-2026-12143#1053
rhdmalone wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.22from
rhdmalone:release-4.22

Conversation

@rhdmalone

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix for CVE-2026-12143: form-data does not escape CR/LF/quote in multipart field names and filenames (CRLF injection)
updates form-data to 4.0.6 or higher and makes other associated changes

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rhdmalone: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-89698, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-89698 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.0.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Fix for CVE-2026-12143: form-data does not escape CR/LF/quote in multipart field names and filenames (CRLF injection)
updates form-data to 4.0.6 or higher and makes other associated changes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from etmurasaki and jgbernalp July 13, 2026 16:52
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhdmalone
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jgbernalp for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rhdmalone: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label jira/skip-dependent-bug-check

since 5.0 is not using form-data except for dependencies and it's already 4.0.6

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the jira/skip-dependent-bug-check Indicates that the referenced Jira bug does not require a dependent bug. label Jul 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rhdmalone: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-89698, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

4 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Fix for CVE-2026-12143: form-data does not escape CR/LF/quote in multipart field names and filenames (CRLF injection)
updates form-data to 4.0.6 or higher and makes other associated changes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@germanparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-89698, which is valid.

4 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/skip-dependent-bug-check Indicates that the referenced Jira bug does not require a dependent bug. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants