Skip to content

docs(pm-dispatch): cut-moment console-bump precondition in the release protocol (#7275 Option A) + claim-time label-pair atomicity (#7239) - #7416

Draft
os-help wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/issue-7275-cut-moment-bump-precondition
Draft

docs(pm-dispatch): cut-moment console-bump precondition in the release protocol (#7275 Option A) + claim-time label-pair atomicity (#7239)#7416
os-help wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/issue-7275-cut-moment-bump-precondition

Conversation

@os-help

@os-help os-help commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fixes #7275
Part of #7239 (devx half only — the engine-core half stays open on that card)

What this PR does

Two ruled edits to .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md, nothing else:

  1. No producer files the final console bump card at the release-cut moment — the #6162 chore is keyed to a settled window, and the card it does file never reaches the release board #7275 Option A — cut-moment precondition. In the 「发版时刻 = 清板,不是重扫」 paragraph, the pre-ruling deferral tail (「…处置形态待裁。⛔ 在 No producer files the final console bump card at the release-cut moment — the #6162 chore is keyed to a settled window, and the card it does file never reaches the release board #7275 有裁决之前,不要把「两张板已清空」读成「console bump 也已就位」——这两件事今天没有任何机械关联。」) is replaced by the ruled precondition: before board-clearing begins, take the pin readout once (.objectui-sha vs objectui main; once, not a rescan); if the pin lags, the console bump card must exist and be boarded (target:<major>, boarded by the seat that already owns that label's production — the bump card lives in objectstack, so the triage seat; single-producer is preserved) or be explicitly waived with the standard accepted-for-GA comment. Neither ⇒ no cut. The surrounding case-law (window-close trigger ≠ cut moment, pm:queue-only specimen chore: bump the console pin to pick up objectui#4071 (approvals:inbox component ref) #7268, the Release process: prevent frontend (objectui) changesets being missed when the console pin lags #3340/release workflow: publish pushes tags + npm but its version commit never reaches main — twice now (rc.3 c6a52d3, rc.4 a10cbc77); landing the commit must be part of the publish lane #6170 hard gates protecting the release record) is kept and now reads as the rationale for the precondition instead of an open gap.

  2. [decision] engine-core lane drops pm:queue at dispatch without applying pm:dispatched — 7 instances of the ghost-card shape; pick the repair #7239 devx half — label-pair atomicity in step 4. Judged against the current text first, per the dispatch: step 4 item 1 read "Assign to yourself (@me) and add pm:dispatched" and never mentioned removing pm:queue at all — the pair was genuinely unstated, so the clarification is warranted (not a reflexive edit). It now reads: apply pm:dispatched in the same label write that removes pm:queue; the pair is atomic, never half, with the [decision] engine-core lane drops pm:queue at dispatch without applying pm:dispatched — 7 instances of the ghost-card shape; pick the repair #7239 ghost-card shape as the recorded reason.

Authorization (quoted verbatim)

Maintainer ruling on #7275 (2026-08-10 07:34Z):

Option A — a cut-moment precondition in the release protocol. Before a cut, the release protocol takes the pin readout once; if the pin lags, the console bump card must exist and be boarded (target:v17) or explicitly waived with the standard accepted-for-GA comment. Boarding is done by the seat that already owns target:v17, preserving single-producer.

Maintainer ruling on #7239 (2026-08-10 05:09Z), devx-half clause:

Option A. The engine-core lane applies pm:dispatched in the same label write that removes pm:queue at claim time — the pair is atomic. … devx seat lands a one-line SKILL clarification if the dispatch-flow text is ambiguous about atomicity.

⚠️ Maintainer-merged only

Per the standing constraint recorded on #6906's claim chain and #7275's claim comment: this PR edits the SKILL governing the dispatching seat's own behavior, so it is maintainer-merged only — opened as draft for the PM to review and flip ready; it must not be enqueued and auto-merge must not be enabled.

#6906 transfer note

The deliverable-1 remainder of #6906 (closed) was transferred onto this card by the 2026-08-10 10:28Z closure audit. Verified on origin/main before editing: the transfer premise was stale — PR #7292 (merged 2026-08-10 07:18Z, commit 2cad546) had already landed the two-query 「消费者三处」 bullet, and no 「归 #6906」 deferral note exists in the file. The only live remainder was the 「处置形态待裁 / ⛔ 在 #7275 有裁决之前」 tail, which edit 1 resolves. No further #6906 work remained; nothing else was touched.

Checks

  • check:pm-skill-ratchet ✅ 3,027 lines (ceiling 3,050; headroom 23)
  • check:skill-frame-sync ✅ · check:doc-authoring ✅ · check:nul-bytes
  • check:doc-formula-expressionsno such script exists in this repo (searched package.json and scripts/); listed in the dispatch but not runnable, noted in the report.
  • .claude/**-only diff ⇒ no changeset (PM applies skip-changeset at review).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01QAjoh3k1z5Q4EAqHzvZuJr


Generated by Claude Code

…e protocol (#7275 Option A), claim-time label pair is atomic (#7239)

Release protocol (发版时刻 = 清板): replace the pre-ruling deferral tail
(处置形态待裁 / ⛔ 在 #7275 有裁决之前) with the ruled precondition — before
a cut, take the pin readout once; if the pin lags, the console bump card
must exist and be boarded (target:<major>, by the seat that owns that
label's production) or explicitly waived with the standard accepted-for-GA
comment. Maintainer ruling 2026-08-10 on #7275 (Option A).

Step 4 claim: state the label pair explicitly — pm:dispatched is applied
in the same label write that removes pm:queue; the pair is atomic
(maintainer ruling 2026-08-10 on #7239, devx half).

The #6906 deliverable-1 remainder (two-query consumer bullet) was already
landed by #7292; no further edit needed there.

Fixes #7275
Part of #7239

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QAjoh3k1z5Q4EAqHzvZuJr
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
objectstack Ignored Ignored Aug 10, 2026 10:39am

Request Review

@github-actions github-actions Bot added size/s documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Aug 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation size/s

Projects

None yet

2 participants