fix: resume interrupted complex page generations

[nettee]

Summary

• treat visible streamed output as a resumable boundary so interrupted text-heavy generations can continue instead of restarting from scratch
• seed a new project conversation from the active conversation when its messages are loaded so project-level design context carries into the next session
• add focused daemon and web tests that cover both behaviors

Validation

• pnpm --filter @open-design/web test -- ProjectView.run-isolation.test.tsx
• pnpm --filter @open-design/daemon exec vitest run -c vitest.config.ts tests/run-lifecycle-analytics.test.ts
• pnpm guard
• pnpm typecheck

Closes #4137

_{🔁 Powered by Looper · runner=worker · agent=codex · An autonomous AI dev team for your GitHub repos.}

[lefarcen]

@nettee The summary/validation details here are already clear, but could you add the Surface area checklist to the PR body and tick the boxes this change affects? That makes it easier for the next reviewer to see at a glance that this touches the conversation/resume flow.

Also, I’ve marked this with needs-validation because the ProjectView conversation behavior changed — please hold off on merging it yourself for now, and we’ll loop in QA once it’s merge-ready.

[PerishCode]

@nettee I reviewed the changed daemon resume-boundary logic and the ProjectView seeded-conversation path against the existing conversation API contract and tests. The change stays within the current web/daemon seams, keeps seeded conversation creation on the shared endpoint, and the added coverage targets the two behaviors in this bugfix. I could not rerun the focused Vitest commands locally because this prepared worktree has no installed node_modules, but the implementation reads clean for the changed ranges. Nice work keeping the fix tight and covered.

_{🔁 Powered by Looper · runner=reviewer · agent=codex · An autonomous AI dev team for your GitHub repos.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: decf9d740d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[lefarcen]

@nettee One small PR-body follow-up before this moves along: could you add the Surface area checklist and a brief Bug fix verification note? The summary already explains the change well — what’s still missing is a quick reviewer-facing pointer to which surface this touches, plus the specific before/after seam that proves the interrupted-generation and seeded-conversation regressions are covered.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e728bfc898

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[nettee]

Looper fixer round complete — 9518057

• ✅ Review comment on apps/web/src/components/ProjectView.tsx:5078 (@chatgpt-codex-connector) — thread
  • I updated handleNewConversation in apps/web/src/components/ProjectView.tsx to depend on the full messages snapshot instead of only messages.length, and added a regression test in apps/web/tests/components/ProjectView.run-isolation.test.tsx that covers same-length message content updates before creating a new conversation.

_{🔁 Powered by Looper · runner=fixer · agent=codex · An autonomous AI dev team for your GitHub repos.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

To use Codex here, create an environment for this repo.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9518057070

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[nettee]

Looper fixer round complete — ad324cd

• ✅ Review comment on apps/daemon/src/server.ts:2191 (@chatgpt-codex-connector) — thread
  • Updated apps/daemon/tests/run-resume-on-failure.test.ts so the text-only upstream-drop case now expects a resumable failure and verifies the next turn resumes the saved session. The fake Claude fixture in that test now emits streamed text on the interrupted attempt and records CLI args for the resumed turn.

_{🔁 Powered by Looper · runner=fixer · agent=codex · An autonomous AI dev team for your GitHub repos.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

To use Codex here, create an environment for this repo.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ad324cdd7a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[nettee]

Looper fixer round complete — 9828d70

• ✅ Review comment on apps/web/src/components/ProjectView.tsx (@chatgpt-codex-connector) — thread
  • Updated apps/web/src/components/ProjectView.tsx so handleNewConversation sends only seedFromConversationId, and adjusted apps/web/tests/components/ProjectView.run-isolation.test.tsx to assert the compact payload instead of the full message snapshot.

_{🔁 Powered by Looper · runner=fixer · agent=codex · An autonomous AI dev team for your GitHub repos.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

To use Codex here, create an environment for this repo.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 40d43ebfc1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[nettee]

Looper fixer round complete — 8fe6ed9

• ✅ Review comment on apps/web/src/components/ProjectView.tsx (@chatgpt-codex-connector) — thread
  • Removed seedMessages from handleNewConversation in apps/web/src/components/ProjectView.tsx so New only posts seedFromConversationId, and updated apps/web/tests/components/ProjectView.run-isolation.test.tsx to assert the compact payload.

_{🔁 Powered by Looper · runner=fixer · agent=codex · An autonomous AI dev team for your GitHub repos.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

To use Codex here, create an environment for this repo.