Add Filesystems Working Group (filesystems-wg) - #171
Open
claude[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Pulumi PreviewClick to expand preview output |
dsp-ant
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 20, 2026 22:29
dsp-ant
previously approved these changes
Aug 20, 2026
# Conflicts: # src/config/roleIds.ts # src/config/roles.ts
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Requested by David Soria Parra · Slack thread
Before/After
Before, the Filesystems Working Group proposed in modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol#3282 has no access modeling. After, it has a
filesystems-wgrole that projects to a GitHub teamfilesystems-wg(nested under theworking-groupscontainer team) and a synced Discord role, with the two proposed WG leads (@sambhav, @olaservo) as members.How
src/config/roleIds.ts(FILESYSTEMS_WG: 'filesystems-wg').src/config/roles.tsfollowing the existing WG pattern (GitHub team underworking-groups, Discord rolefilesystems working group (synced)).memberOfadditions insrc/config/users.ts(sambhav,olaservo).Notes
Draft on purpose — do not merge until modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol#3282 lands (the WG's formation PR, currently changes-requested). The Discord channel itself is not managed by this repo. Neither lead is added to the
wg-ig-facilitatorscalendar role; say the word if WG leads should get it.Generated by Claude Code