Complete 1#2165
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your solution correctly implements all core requirements for the split_integer function. The tests pass and verify the function returns the correct number of parts, preserves the sum, maintains max-min difference within 1, sorts ascending, and handles all specified examples. One minor style suggestion: in test_difference_between_max_and_min_less_or_equal_one, you create a parts variable that is only used once in the assertion. Per [CHECKLIST ITEM #1], consider comparing the result directly: assert max(split_integer(17, 4)) - min(split_integer(17, 4)) <= 1. This is a minor style preference, not a functional issue, so your solution is approved.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.