Integer Tests#2162
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your test file is functionally correct and successfully covers all key requirements for the split_integer function — including sum validation, equal parts distribution, single-part handling, sorting behavior, and edge cases with zeros. The tests demonstrate solid understanding of the task requirements. One minor style improvement noted per [CHECKLIST ITEM #1]: the result variable on line 17 is only used once in the immediately following assert, so it can be removed. You can directly use split_integer(17, 4) in the assert statement like: assert split_integer(17, 4) == sorted(split_integer(17, 4)). The core functionality and test logic are solid — this is purely a code cleanliness suggestion. Keep up the good work on test coverage!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
|
|
||
| def test_parts_should_be_sorted_when_they_are_not_equal() -> None: | ||
| pass | ||
| result = split_integer(17, 4) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Violates checklist item #1: Avoid creating unnecessary variables for simple tests. The result variable is only used once in the next line's assert, so it can be removed.
2 participants
No description provided.