Solution

[Vitalii85]

No description provided.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Review Summary

I am approving your solution because the tests you wrote for split_integer clearly satisfy the task requirements and the checklist. You correctly used pytest-style tests, named them descriptively, and directly asserted on the function’s return values (or their sum) without introducing unnecessary variables, which aligns with [CHECKLIST ITEM #1] and [CHECKLIST ITEM #2]. The provided example scenarios (e.g., 8,1, 6,2, 17,4, 32,6) are covered, and the expectations you assert ensure the list is sorted and that the parts differ by at most 1. You also added a meaningful edge case where value < number_of_parts, which strengthens coverage without overcomplicating the test file. There is no leftover debug or helper code, so [CHECKLIST ITEM #3] is also respected. Overall, your tests are concise, focused on observable behavior, and give good confidence that a correct implementation of split_integer will meet the specification.

---

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center¹. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

1. Rate AI review example ↩