BlockSpec check_state_transition#1186
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
This fixes it :-) Not specific about this PR, but in general, my opinion is that the interface should be different, but I can send that in a different Pr after this is merged. The test writer writes state_transition(pre_state, block), so the interface is hiding that things are being done to the pre_state before calling state_transition by default. I think the default would be to use the pre_state as is, and if we would like to process_slots before calling state_transition, that would be the extra option. I think that would follow better the principle of Least Surprise. |
tcoratger
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🗒️ Description
Add
check_state_transitiontoBlockSpec.Fixes
test_process_slots_target_equal_to_state_slot_rejectedtest.Can be backported to devnet4.
🔗 Related Issues or PRs
Closes #1183
✅ Checklist
just check