fix(ci): validate static workflow identity

[liangshuo-1]

Summary

Fix Semantic Review failures after CI adopted the dynamic CI / <PR number> run name. Workflow identity is now verified from the static Actions workflow metadata while preserving the existing fail-closed repository, event, path, and SHA checks.

Changes

• Resolve the triggering workflow through its validated workflow_id in both the PR quality summary and semantic review jobs.
• Verify the static workflow name and path, and reject mismatches between workflow metadata and the workflow-run payload path.
• Add regression coverage that prevents dynamic workflow_run.name from being reused as workflow identity.

Test Plan

• make script-test (150 tests)
• make unit-test
• go vet ./...
• gofmt -l . produces no output
• go mod tidy leaves go.mod and go.sum unchanged
• go run github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/v2/cmd/golangci-lint@v2.1.6 run --new-from-rev=origin/main reports 0 issues

Related Issues

• Reproduced by Semantic Review run 29927302591.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f3083054-52b5-45ee-a4b7-a34702029143

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/semantic-review-workflow-name

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}