Skip to content

Bug fix: correct link in fdr checklist #109

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
masc2023 merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Bug fix: correct link in fdr checklist #109

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ Please note that it is mandatory to fill in the "passed" column with "yes" or "n
- Comment

* - Gen 1
- Are the safety analysis performed according to the defined process and templates? See :need:`gd_req__saf_structure` and also :need:`doc__feature_name_fmea` and :need:`doc__feature_name_dfa`
- Are the safety analysis performed according to the defined process and templates? See :need:`gd_req__saf_structure` and also :need:`gd_temp__feat_saf_fmea` and :need:`gd_temp__feat_saf_dfa`
- [YES | NO ]
- :need:`[[title]] <std_req__iso26262__analysis_841>`, :need:`[[title]] <std_req__iso26262__analysis_849>`, :need:`[[title]] <std_req__iso26262__analysis_8410>`, :need:`[[title]] <std_req__iso26262__analysis_748>`
- <Rationale for result>
Expand Down
Loading