Skip to content

chore: bump lodestar to v1.44.0#71

Merged
nflaig merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tropibot/bump-lodestar-v1.44.0
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

chore: bump lodestar to v1.44.0#71
nflaig merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
tropibot/bump-lodestar-v1.44.0

Conversation

@tropibot

@tropibot tropibot Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated version bump triggered by release v1.44.0.

Changes

  • upstream version (ChainSafe/lodestar) → v1.44.0
  • UPSTREAM_VERSIONv1.44.0

@tropibot

tropibot Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

✅ TropiBot report: SYNC TEST REPORT - PASSED

This CI runs on a real DAppNode using the same RPC calls a user would make to configure a staker setup: execution client, consensus client, web3signer, MEV-boost, and relays.

📦 Package Under Test

📦 Clients Used

Component DNP Name
Execution hoodi-reth.dnp.dappnode.eth
Consensus lodestar-hoodi.dnp.dappnode.eth
Web3Signer web3signer-hoodi.dnp.dappnode.eth
MEV Boost mev-boost-hoodi.dnp.dappnode.eth
Network hoodi

🔖 Version Tracking

Client Before After
Execution reth/v2.0.0-eb4c15e/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu reth/v2.0.0-eb4c15e/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Consensus n/a Lodestar/v1.44.0/e3d733b

⏱️ Timing

Operation Duration Status
SetStakerConfig 5m 2s
PackageInstall 34.5s
WaitForSync 48.3s

Total Duration: 7m 12s


📋 View full CI logs

Comment thread dappnode_package.json
},
"requirements": {
"minimumDappnodeVersion": "0.2.106"
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Marketen any idea why there is such a large diff in this file?

@3alpha 3alpha Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Parser of a new bot implementation returns keys alphabetically. Bit annoying for the first bump, but should be fine later.

@nflaig nflaig merged commit ca74e2d into main Jul 6, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants