docs: document contribution and security workflows - #2
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds repository contribution rules, a standardized pull request template, and a security policy covering private vulnerability reporting, fallback handling, and coordinated disclosure. ChangesRepository Governance and Security
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@CONTRIBUTING.md`:
- Around line 59-60: Update the branching instructions in CONTRIBUTING.md to
explicitly fetch the latest origin/main before creating a focused branch, and
use origin/main as the branch source instead of local main. Preserve the
existing fork guidance for contributors without write access.
- Around line 181-183: Update the security-reporting guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md
to prohibit opening public issues for all suspected vulnerabilities, while
retaining the existing examples of secrets, authentication bypasses, and
private-workspace exposure and the reference to SECURITY.md.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 873a4b1b-7713-4eaa-8ec2-eaeee0d2a322
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/pull_request_template.mdAGENTS.mdCONTRIBUTING.mdREADME.mdSECURITY.mddocs/security.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 6 files
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Re-trigger cubic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 1 file (changes from recent commits).
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Re-trigger cubic
Summary
mainpull request workflow and required GitHub gatesWhy
The repository now requires pull requests,
Verify, CodeQL scanning, resolved review conversations, and squash merging, but the contributor and agent documentation did not describe that workflow. The repository also lacked a GitHub-recognized security policy and private vulnerability-reporting guidance.Validation
git diff --cached --checkgit diff origin/main...HEAD --checkThis is a documentation-only change, so code tests were not run.
Summary by CodeRabbit