Skip to content

Fix reminder suppression handling (OUT-3994) - #1394

Draft
cursor[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/out-3994-cursor-automated-triage-response-e117
Draft

Fix reminder suppression handling (OUT-3994)#1394
cursor[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/out-3994-cursor-automated-triage-response-e117

Conversation

@cursor

@cursor cursor Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Changes

  • Treat a successful Copilot response with no created reminder notification as a terminal no-op instead of a retryable exception
  • Preserve reminder ledger rows when individual or grouped reminder delivery is suppressed
  • Keep actual Copilot errors retryable and covered by existing failure compensation
  • Add unit and real-Postgres integration coverage for suppression behavior

Testing Criteria

  • Focused individual and grouped reminder suites: 22 tests passed
  • Reminder idempotency integration suite against Postgres 16: 4 tests passed, including ledger preservation and no Sentry capture on suppression
  • ESLint passed with 35 existing warnings; Prettier check passed

Notes

  • yarn tsc remains blocked by the repository's existing missing SVG module declaration errors in src/icons/index.ts; no errors referenced changed reminder files.
  • No config or dependency changes are required.

Impact & Surface Area of Change

  • Individual and grouped Trigger.dev reminder dispatches now distinguish a suppressed/no-op Copilot result (sent: false) from a delivery error. Delivery errors still retry and compensate ledger rows after retries are exhausted.
Open in Web View Automation 

Co-authored-by: Neil Raina <makeitraina@users.noreply.github.com>
@linear-code

linear-code Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

OUT-3994

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
tasks-app Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 15, 2026 12:14am

Request Review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant