You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
microservices are small. Some microservices run 1000 of them
Independently deployable: replace x by y with changing anything else
Successful microservice architecture should implement DDD (Domain Driven Desing)
Handling microservices depends on logging
In microservices there is no too much testing, most of the testing is done by unitesting. Manual testing is not possible because the systems is highly random
Microservices can be seen as an object and pull ideas from OOP:
delegation!
hide data
do things!
You should not know who is talking to? no IP or names!
BASIC RULE: replacement principle. YOU SHOULD BE ABEL TO RADICALLY CHANGE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A CLASS WITHOUT IMPATNING THE CLIENTS.
Bounded context: a way of model business. Example
context of the store:
books: a name author
cashier...
context warehouse:
books: how heavy, size
Context microservices are isolated!!! they connected via ports.
Ubiquity languages which is a kinda language. translating protocols
UI: the agent architecture.
each view has it own controller database and private communication API
Communication. No SOAP, No REST. Nothing CRUD! accessing data! Therefore RabbitMQ or ZeroMQ are good choices
microservices in healthcare
DDD is the ideal software design paradigm that fits the nature of microservices very well
The model should reflect the structure of the organization
Microservices focus on security since all calls implement authentification checks in the destination service.
About
toy example of a microservices architecture in healthcare