Skip to content

Fix brand casing (Zenrows, not ZenRows) in Adaptive Stealth Mode docs - #26

Merged
AnderRV merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/zenrows-casing-asm-docs
Aug 21, 2026
Merged

Fix brand casing (Zenrows, not ZenRows) in Adaptive Stealth Mode docs#26
AnderRV merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/zenrows-casing-asm-docs

Conversation

@AnderRV

@AnderRV AnderRV commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Same miss as `zenrows-python-sdk` #14: the Adaptive Stealth Mode (`mode: "auto"`) docs were added after the earlier brand-casing sweep had already run, and the prose text describing it ("let ZenRows pick the request configuration for you...") was evidently reused across SDKs during that port without re-checking the "Zenrows, not ZenRows" rule (commit 9f1f00c6d).

Fixed the two spots: the README's Adaptive Stealth Mode section, and `ZenRowsConfig.mode`'s JSDoc in `src/index.ts`.

Class/export names (`ZenRows`, `ZenRowsBatchClient`, `ZenRowsConfig`) are unchanged — those are published identifiers, not prose.

Verification

  • Re-swept `README.md`/`src/` for the same pattern — zero remaining violations.
  • `pnpm run check` (biome) clean.
  • `pnpm test -- --run` — 122/122 pass.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01DTXXBERPGEnYiYP4Mt3FjF

Per commit 9f1f00c6d: user-facing prose spells the brand "Zenrows"
(capital Z, lowercase r). The ASM feature (mode: "auto") was added
after the earlier casing sweep had already run, so this specific new
prose in the README and the ZenRowsConfig.mode JSDoc was never
checked. Same miss found and fixed in zenrows-python-sdk's #14 and
zenrows-go-sdk's Mode type doc — this text was evidently reused
across SDKs during the ASM port.

Class/export names (ZenRows, ZenRowsBatchClient, ZenRowsConfig) stay
unchanged — those are published identifiers, not prose.
@AnderRV AnderRV self-assigned this Aug 21, 2026
@AnderRV
AnderRV merged commit d254834 into main Aug 21, 2026
1 check passed
@AnderRV
AnderRV deleted the fix/zenrows-casing-asm-docs branch August 21, 2026 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant