Skip to content

PR_26171_GAMMA_028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report#50

Merged
ToolboxAid merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pr/26171-GAMMA-028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

PR_26171_GAMMA_028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report#50
ToolboxAid merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
pr/26171-GAMMA-028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report

Conversation

@ToolboxAid

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Captures the final SQLite inventory after PR026 and PR027.
  • Confirms active runtime SQLite implementation count is 0 and Local API SQLite reference count is 0.
  • Documents remaining references as governance/docs, negative tests, archive/reference, and allowed technical debt guards.

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • git diff --cached --check
  • Inventory verification for active implementation markers and Local API SQLite references
  • No Playwright; report-only changes
  • No samples

Reports

  • docs_build/dev/reports/codex_review.diff
  • docs_build/dev/reports/codex_changed_files.txt
  • docs_build/dev/reports/PR_26171_GAMMA_028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report.md
  • docs_build/dev/reports/PR_26171_GAMMA_028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report-manual-validation-notes.md
  • docs_build/dev/reports/PR_26171_GAMMA_028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report-instruction-compliance-checklist.md

ZIP

  • tmp/PR_26171_GAMMA_028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report_delta.zip

@ToolboxAid ToolboxAid marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2026 22:45
@ToolboxAid ToolboxAid merged commit 6d9af51 into main Jun 24, 2026
1 check passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 299f0323c7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

| Archive/Reference | 130 | 393 | PASS: historical PR/report references retained for traceability. |
| Allowed Technical Debt | 2 | 17 | PASS: validation/governance guard rules plus the Game Journey legacy data-preservation guard. |

Total remaining inventory: 135 files and 422 lines.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Correct the SQLite inventory counts

Rerunning the first inventory command shown above against the reviewed commit's pre-report parent (a66048f5) returns 155 files/495 lines, not 135/422; for example it still matches docs_build/dev/ProjectInstructions/addendums/postgres_only.md, which is not classified anywhere in the report. Since this report is the final SQLite closeout artifact, the understated total/classification can falsely certify that all remaining references were accounted for.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +1 to +5
docs_build/dev/reports/PR_26171_GAMMA_028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report-instruction-compliance-checklist.md / added
docs_build/dev/reports/PR_26171_GAMMA_028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report-manual-validation-notes.md / added
docs_build/dev/reports/PR_26171_GAMMA_028-final-sqlite-clean-status-report.md / added
docs_build/dev/reports/codex_changed_files.txt / updated
docs_build/dev/reports/codex_review.diff / updated

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restore required changed-files sections

docs_build/dev/PROJECT_INSTRUCTIONS.md requires codex_changed_files.txt to contain git status --short and git diff --stat, but this artifact now only has a path list with / added or / updated suffixes. Consumers using the required review artifact lose the status/stat evidence for this run, so regenerate it in the documented format instead of replacing it with a custom list.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant