docs: amend and promote itd-93 to planned#142
Open
REPPL wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Fold the four decisions the 2026-07-24 maintainer grill settled into itd-93 and promote it drafts/ -> planned/ (mints spc-14, links both sides). The grill resolved all four of the intent's open questions: (a) the surface is a launch sub-verb (abcd launch scaffold) extending 04-launch; (b) self-scaffold parity -- one template, from which abcd-cli's own release workflows are regenerated under a parity test, so the proven pattern and the template are one artifact; (c) a built-in workflow_dispatch rehearsal mode that arms the full gate against a simulated roll, publishes nothing, and whose green run is the runbook precondition for the first real release; (d) the dated CHANGELOG heading IS the itd-73 seam, so launch ship's derived version is one optional producer. Intent: name the launch sub-verb where it read "verb TBD", add the parity, rehearsal, and producer-agnostic scope bullets, and amend the acceptance criteria for rehearsal mode -- the five seeded criteria stand (AC1/AC4 name the sub-verb, AC2 gains the green-rehearsal precondition) plus a sixth covering the rehearsal itself. Conform to house format (References -> Prior Art before Open Questions; add Audit Notes). Spec: spc-14 carries the PRD synthesised from the grill and intent only, at the resolution the grill settled. Implementation design and build are a separate focused run (queue Track 1: "Promotion only") and are called out as out of scope for this spec. Also repoint the 2026-07-18 queue's itd-93 link from drafts/ to planned/ (orphaned by the move). Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Amends and promotes intent itd-93 (the scaffolded release gate) from drafts/ to planned/ — the last Track 1 item of the current run queue. Promotion only: implementation is deliberately NOT in this change (feature-class; it gets its own focused run).
Unlike the run's other PRs this one branches from main (record-only, no dependency on the open chain) and can merge independently.
What changed
launchsub-verb extending the launch family; self-scaffold parity (this repo's own release workflows regenerate from the shipped template, with a parity test — one artifact, not two); a built-inworkflow_dispatchrehearsal mode that arms the full gate against a simulated roll and publishes nothing, a green rehearsal being the runbook precondition for the first real release; and the changelog dated-heading format as the versioning seam, withlaunch shipone optional producer.abcd intent plan itd-93performed the lifecycle move and minted spc-14 (bidirectionally linked, kind standalone, severity minor). The spec fixes the PRD at the grill's resolution and explicitly defers implementation design to the focused run.Source discipline (the run's STOP guard for this item)
Every added sentence traces to exactly two sources — the grill entry in
.abcd/work/DECISIONS.mdor the pre-existing draft with its RESOLVED open questions. Where both were silent (a SOTA section, theimpactfield, implementation-level spec detail), the writer omitted rather than invented, and each omission is recorded in the run journal. An independent fresh-context fidelity audit reviewed every added line against the two sources before this PR opened.Verification
abcd intent ready itd-93: exit 1 (draft, no spec) before → exit 0 (planned, 6 ACs, spc-14 linked, body written) after — verified independently by the orchestrator.record-lintexit 0 (the one blocker the move surfaced — the stale drafts/ link — was the orphan fixed above);make preflightexit 0.