Skip to content

Add msp_google_native and msp_google_banner bidder names - #133

Merged
zwl-williamzha merged 1 commit into
msp-2506from
add-msp-google-native-banner-bidders
Aug 6, 2026
Merged

Add msp_google_native and msp_google_banner bidder names#133
zwl-williamzha merged 1 commit into
msp-2506from
add-msp-google-native-banner-bidders

Conversation

@zwl-williamzha

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Register two Google sibling bidder names, msp_google_native and msp_google_banner, so MSP can call the Google adapter separately per format.

Follows the existing MSP bidder pattern established by #131 (msp_bidease):

  • const in the MSP-extension block of openrtb_ext/bidders.go
  • entry in mspBidderNames() in openrtb_ext/msp_bidders.go

Both names are served by the existing msp_google.so, the same way msp_moloco_native shares msp_moloco.so. The MSP-side PR supplies the native-only / banner-only bidder-info, the bidder-params schemas, and the per-env adapters.* config, and bumps the submodule pointer to this commit.

Testing

  • go build ./openrtb_ext/... and go vet ./openrtb_ext/ clean
  • go test ./openrtb_ext/... ./config/... pass
  • TestBidderInfoFiles passes against the MSP static files. Verified that test has teeth: adding an unregistered bidder-info file makes it fail with unknown bidder, so a green run is real evidence both new names resolve.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Register two Google sibling bidder names so MSP can call the Google
adapter separately per format, following the existing MSP bidder
pattern (const in the MSP-extension block + entry in mspBidderNames()).

Both are served by the existing msp_google.so; the MSP side supplies
native-only / banner-only bidder-info and the per-env adapter config.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@zwl-williamzha
zwl-williamzha merged commit 57b71d7 into msp-2506 Aug 6, 2026
@zwl-williamzha
zwl-williamzha deleted the add-msp-google-native-banner-bidders branch August 6, 2026 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants