Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade io.vertx:vertx-core from 3.8.5 to 4.5.29#410

Open
benjaminhuo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-06416afe7cb121e9dd6a1b67f409a39e
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade io.vertx:vertx-core from 3.8.5 to 4.5.29#410
benjaminhuo wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-06416afe7cb121e9dd6a1b67f409a39e

Conversation

@benjaminhuo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • builders/testdata/java/vertx-helloworld/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
high severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JAVA-IONETTY-18170202
  828   io.vertx:vertx-core:
3.8.5 -> 4.5.29
Major version upgrade Proof of Concept
high severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JAVA-IONETTY-18170204
  828   io.vertx:vertx-core:
3.8.5 -> 4.5.29
Major version upgrade Proof of Concept
high severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JAVA-IONETTY-18170213
  721   io.vertx:vertx-core:
3.8.5 -> 4.5.29
Major version upgrade No Known Exploit

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: High

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

@benjaminhuo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Merge Risk: High

The upgrade from Vert.x 3.8.5 to 4.5.29 is a major version jump with significant breaking changes that require substantial developer effort to migrate.

Key Breaking Changes:

  • Asynchronous Operations: Vert.x 4 introduces a Future-based model for asynchronous operations as a primary alternative to callbacks. While callbacks are still supported to ease migration, many APIs have been updated to return Futures, and this is the preferred approach moving forward.
  • API Removals: APIs that were deprecated in Vert.x 3.x have been removed in version 4. This includes the removal of multi-threaded worker verticles, which should be replaced with Vertx.executeBlocking().
  • WriteStream API: The write and end methods on WriteStream are no longer fluent (they do not return the stream instance). This will break any chained calls.
  • JSON Handling: The direct dependency on Jackson Databind is now optional and must be added explicitly for object mapping. Static methods like Json.mapper() have been removed and replaced by methods in io.vertx.core.json.jackson.DatabindCodec.
  • EventBus & Messaging: The MessageProducer interface no longer extends WriteStream, and some request-response send methods on the EventBus have been removed.
  • Vert.x Web: The vertx-web-api-contract module is deprecated and users must migrate to the new vertx-web-openapi module. Several interfaces and methods within Vert.x Web have been removed or replaced.

Source: Eclipse Vert.x 4.0 Migration Guide
Recommendation: This is a major migration that requires careful planning and significant code refactoring. Developers must follow the official migration guide closely to update asynchronous handling, API calls, and dependencies. This upgrade should be handled in a separate, dedicated effort.

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@CLAassistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants