🛡️ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] Fix bare except blocks swallowing system signals - #26
🛡️ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] Fix bare except blocks swallowing system signals#26NoWon1 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: NoWon1 <126711057+NoWon1@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🚨 Severity: MEDIUM
💡 Vulnerability: Bare
except:blocks inside tightly nested spatial loops.🎯 Impact: These blocks catch all exceptions, including
KeyboardInterruptorSystemExitfromBaseException. This can make the process unkillable and cause a localized Denial of Service (DoS).🔧 Fix: Replaced all bare
except:statements withexcept Exception:to ensure that system-level exceptions can propagate correctly while continuing to catch standard application errors within the loops.✅ Verification: Ran
banditsecurity linter andpytest. Also compiled withpython -m py_compileto ensure valid syntax. Checked withgrepthat no bareexcept:blocks remain.PR created automatically by Jules for task 13625477491284353165 started by @NoWon1