Small feature: go to node with given serial number - #3963
Open
WolframPfeifer wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Member
|
Nice feature! Thanks! |
mattulbrich
force-pushed
the
pfeifer/gotoNode
branch
from
August 15, 2026 13:38
7c71a30 to
0f4ce62
Compare
mattulbrich
approved these changes
Aug 15, 2026
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Like it! thanks!
@WolframPfeifer please check the changes are improvements.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a small feature: An entry "Go to Node..." to the proof tree settings menu (gear symbol) and the proof menu which prompts the user jumps to the proof node with the given serial number (if it exists in the proof).
This is particularly useful with the slicing and caching extensions (but also with proof replay), when you receive an error message with a node number.
Note that one could also use the "Search in Proof Tree" as a workaround (which I noticed only after implementing the feature), but this is less precise: If you search for "100" for instance, also the nodes "1001", "1002", ..., "1100", etc. are found.
Type of pull request
Ensuring quality
Additional information and contact(s)
The contributions within this pull request are licensed under GPLv2 (only) for inclusion in KeY.