[SDK-487] is ok toshow parity#1070
Open
franco-zalamena-iterable wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🔹 Jira Ticket(s) if any
✏️ Description
Android did not have a proper way to defer an in-app showing in a way that was not setting a flag to a specific value, the problem with that is the possibility of a racing condition. So this adds a way of having a check if it is deffered in the same place as we check for SHOW or SKIP.
The enum change is a public api change but the API never returns this value, it's intake only, so it should not be a big concern for integrators
[Pending testing video]