Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ <h1>ORNL Clostridium-Desulfovibrio-Geobacter Trophic Model Community</h1>
</span>
</div>


</div>
</section>

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -690,6 +691,19 @@ <h3>Cellobiose Fermentation Supports Partner Growth</h3>



<div class="interaction-flow">
<strong>Downstream Effects:</strong>

<div class="flow-item">
<span class="flow-arrow">→</span> Sulfate-Linked Dependence of D. vulgaris
</div>

<div class="flow-item">
<span class="flow-arrow">→</span> Fumarate-Linked Dependence of G. sulfurreducens
</div>

</div>



<h4>Evidence</h4>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -919,6 +933,45 @@ <h4>Evidence</h4>

<!-- Associated Datasets -->

<section id="discussions">
<h2>Knowledge gaps &amp; discussions <span class="muted">(1)</span></h2>

<div class="discussion">
<h3>
<span class="role-badge">KNOWLEDGE_GAP</span>
<span class="role-badge">OPEN</span>
Which exact C. cellulolyticum fermentation products are transferred to D. vulgaris and G. sulfurreducens, and is the electron-acceptor to cross-feeding coupling perturbation-demonstrated rather than only abstract-level implied?

</h3>
<p class="prewrap">The curated donor-to-partner causal edges rest on the abstract statement that the partners &#34;derived carbon and energy from the metabolic products&#34; of C. cellulolyticum; the primary full text (doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-149) was not retrievable, so the exact exchanged metabolites and any sulfate/fumarate-removal or inhibitor perturbation evidence remain unresolved. Products reported for a related two-species C. cellulolyticum / G. sulfurreducens fuel-cell system (acetate, ethanol, H2) must NOT be imported here without exact-system verification.
</p>

<p class="muted small">Attaches to: <code>ecological_interactions#Sulfate-Linked Dependence of D. vulgaris</code>, <code>ecological_interactions#Fumarate-Linked Dependence of G. sulfurreducens</code></p>



<details class="evidence-list">
<summary class="muted small">1 evidence item(s)</summary>

<div class="evidence">
<div class="evidence-head">
<span class="badge small">IN_VITRO</span>
<span class="badge small">PARTIAL</span>


doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-149

</div>
<p class="snippet small prewrap">D. vulgaris and G. sulfurreducens derived carbon and energy from the metabolic products</p>
<p class="muted small prewrap">The cross-feeding is stated only at the level of &#34;metabolic products&#34; without naming the exact exchanged compounds — the basis for filing this as a knowledge gap.</p>
</div>

</details>


</div>

</section>

<!-- Environmental Factors -->

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -166,6 +166,20 @@ ecological_interactions:
term:
id: GO:0006113
label: fermentation
downstream:
- target: Sulfate-Linked Dependence of D. vulgaris
description: >
C. cellulolyticum cellobiose-fermentation products are the carbon/energy
(electron-donor) source D. vulgaris consumes while reducing its supplied
sulfate acceptor; the fermentation cross-feeding is required for
D. vulgaris's sulfate-linked growth. (Abstract-level / directly implied,
not perturbation-demonstrated.)
- target: Fumarate-Linked Dependence of G. sulfurreducens
description: >
The same fermentation products support G. sulfurreducens, which reduces
its supplied fumarate acceptor; the cross-feeding is required for its
fumarate-linked growth. (Abstract-level / directly implied, not
perturbation-demonstrated.)
evidence:
- reference: doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-149
supports: SUPPORT
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -404,3 +418,31 @@ metal_relevance: NOT_APPLICABLE
metal_notes: >
No metal or rare earth amendments or direct metal-reduction measurements are curated for this
abstract-supported record.
discussions:
- discussion_id: kg-ornl-exchanged-products-and-edge-strength
prompt: >
Which exact C. cellulolyticum fermentation products are transferred to
D. vulgaris and G. sulfurreducens, and is the electron-acceptor to
cross-feeding coupling perturbation-demonstrated rather than only
abstract-level implied?
kind: KNOWLEDGE_GAP
status: OPEN
attaches_to:
- ecological_interactions#Sulfate-Linked Dependence of D. vulgaris
- ecological_interactions#Fumarate-Linked Dependence of G. sulfurreducens
rationale: >
The curated donor-to-partner causal edges rest on the abstract statement that
the partners "derived carbon and energy from the metabolic products" of
C. cellulolyticum; the primary full text (doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-149) was not
retrievable, so the exact exchanged metabolites and any sulfate/fumarate-removal
or inhibitor perturbation evidence remain unresolved. Products reported for a
related two-species C. cellulolyticum / G. sulfurreducens fuel-cell system
(acetate, ethanol, H2) must NOT be imported here without exact-system
verification.
evidence:
- reference: doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-149
supports: PARTIAL
evidence_source: IN_VITRO
snippet: D. vulgaris and G. sulfurreducens derived carbon and energy from the metabolic products
explanation: The cross-feeding is stated only at the level of "metabolic products" without
naming the exact exchanged compounds — the basis for filing this as a knowledge gap.
Loading