⚡ Bolt: 셀 생성 함수에 .cloneNode 템플릿 캐싱 최적화 적용#321
Conversation
Extracted document.createElement calls into lazily-initialized global template variables and used .cloneNode(false) in createOwnerCellContent, createStatusCellContent, createActualProgressCellContent, and createTextCellContent. This eliminates redundant JS-to-C++ memory allocations during O(N) table rendering loops.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current headae8f1b8c1ba652490700674796c3d7e340058670. -
Head SHA:
ae8f1b8c1ba652490700674796c3d7e340058670 -
Workflow run: 29339601943
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage Decision
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Extracted document.createElement calls into lazily-initialized global template variables and used .cloneNode(false) in createOwnerCellContent, createStatusCellContent, createActualProgressCellContent, and createTextCellContent. This eliminates redundant JS-to-C++ memory allocations during O(N) table rendering loops.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head3778dbb1bd22e2a3aec981f7b0c78fbaed6c358a. -
Head SHA:
3778dbb1bd22e2a3aec981f7b0c78fbaed6c358a -
Workflow run: 29340588265
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
1 participant
💡 What
app.js의createOwnerCellContent,createStatusCellContent,createActualProgressCellContent,createTextCellContent함수 내부에서 반복적으로 실행되던document.createElement()호출을 전역 템플릿 변수로 분리하고,.cloneNode(false)를 사용하여 복제하도록 수정했습니다.🎯 Why
Vanilla JS에서 대규모 테이블 렌더링 시, 루프 내부에서
document.createElement()를 매번 호출하면 JS 환경과 C++(DOM) 환경 간의 할당 오버헤드가 누적되어 렌더링 지연이 발생합니다. 반복 생성되는 정적 요소들을 한 번만 생성하여 캐싱하고 이를 복제(cloneNode)하면 성능이 크게 개선됩니다.📊 Impact
🔬 Measurement
브라우저 DevTools의 Performance 탭에서 수천 개의 태스크를 로드하고 렌더링할 때의 CPU 연산 시간 및 메모리 할당량을 전후로 비교하여 성능 개선 효과를 측정할 수 있습니다.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 4747664697752930789 started by @seonghobae