is_dirty: ignore untracked content inside submodules#3
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Untracked files inside a submodule (build deps, caches) cannot change the code a receipt attests — the parent gitlink pins the submodule content, and a moved pin still reports as modified under --ignore-submodules=untracked. Without this, a consumer whose submodule carries build artifacts can never produce a clean receipt under allow_dirty:false (first hit: GATO's sqpcpu baseline submodule).
Adds tests/test_gitutils.py covering: clean tree, untracked-inside-submodule (clean), untracked-in-parent (dirty), moved pin (dirty).
Consumer flag surface unchanged (GLASS usage unaffected).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code