-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy patharticle.html
More file actions
258 lines (249 loc) · 11 KB
/
Copy patharticle.html
File metadata and controls
258 lines (249 loc) · 11 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Vibe Rounds Cognitive Analytics Series — Article Index</title>
<style>
:root{
--paper:#f7f8fa;
--ink:#0f1b2d;
--ink-soft:#4a5568;
--rule:#e1e5eb;
--card:#ffffff;
--teal:#0891B2;
--teal-deep:#0e7490;
--clay:#a3684a;
--sans: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
--serif: Georgia, "Iowan Old Style", "Palatino Linotype", serif;
}
*{box-sizing:border-box;}
body{
margin:0;
background:var(--paper);
color:var(--ink);
font-family:var(--sans);
line-height:1.65;
}
.wrap{max-width:820px;margin:0 auto;padding:0 20px;}
header.hero{
padding:56px 0 30px;
border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule);
text-align:center;
}
.eyebrow{
font-family:"SFMono-Regular",Consolas,Menlo,monospace;
font-size:.72rem;
letter-spacing:.14em;
text-transform:uppercase;
color:var(--teal);
background:#e9f4f3;
display:inline-block;
padding:4px 12px;
border-radius:4px;
margin-bottom:16px;
}
h1{
font-family:var(--serif);
font-size:2.1rem;
margin:0 0 14px;
max-width:680px;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
}
.dek{
font-size:1.05rem;
color:var(--ink-soft);
max-width:60ch;
margin:0 auto;
}
main{padding:40px 0 70px;}
.track{
position:relative;
margin:0 0 50px;
padding-left:28px;
border-left:2px solid var(--rule);
}
.entry{
position:relative;
margin-bottom:34px;
background:var(--card);
border:1px solid var(--rule);
border-radius:10px;
padding:20px 22px;
}
.entry::before{
content:attr(data-num);
position:absolute;
left:-40px;
top:20px;
width:26px;
height:26px;
border-radius:50%;
background:var(--teal-deep);
color:#fff;
font-family:"SFMono-Regular",Consolas,Menlo,monospace;
font-size:.78rem;
font-weight:700;
display:flex;
align-items:center;
justify-content:center;
}
.entry.mellow::before{ background:var(--clay); }
.kicker{
font-family:"SFMono-Regular",Consolas,Menlo,monospace;
font-size:.7rem;
letter-spacing:.08em;
text-transform:uppercase;
color:var(--teal);
margin-bottom:6px;
}
.entry.mellow .kicker{ color:var(--clay); }
.entry h2{
font-family:var(--serif);
font-size:1.28rem;
margin:0 0 8px;
}
.entry h2 a{ color:var(--ink); text-decoration:none; }
.entry h2 a:hover{ color:var(--teal-deep); }
.entry p{ margin:0 0 12px; color:var(--ink-soft); font-size:.95rem; }
.meta-row{
display:flex;
flex-wrap:wrap;
gap:8px;
margin-bottom:12px;
}
.pill{
font-size:.72rem;
font-family:"SFMono-Regular",Consolas,Menlo,monospace;
background:#eef4f3;
color:var(--teal-deep);
padding:3px 9px;
border-radius:12px;
}
.entry.mellow .pill{ background:#f4e9e1; color:var(--clay); }
.read-link{
font-size:.88rem;
font-weight:600;
color:var(--teal-deep);
text-decoration:none;
border-bottom:1px dotted var(--teal-deep);
}
.entry.mellow .read-link{ color:var(--clay); border-bottom-color:var(--clay); }
.gauge{
margin:14px 0 4px;
display:grid;
grid-template-columns:1fr;
gap:6px;
}
.gauge-row{ display:flex; align-items:center; gap:10px; }
.gauge-label{ font-size:.72rem; color:var(--ink-soft); width:88px; flex-shrink:0; }
.gauge-bar{ flex:1; height:6px; background:#e9edf0; border-radius:3px; overflow:hidden; }
.gauge-fill{ height:100%; background:var(--teal); border-radius:3px; }
.entry.mellow .gauge-fill{ background:var(--clay); }
.thesis-strip{
font-family:var(--serif);
font-size:1.05rem;
color:var(--teal-deep);
text-align:center;
border-top:2px solid var(--teal);
border-bottom:2px solid var(--teal);
padding:18px 10px;
margin:10px 0 46px;
}
footer{
border-top:1px solid var(--rule);
text-align:center;
padding:24px 1rem 50px;
font-size:.85rem;
color:var(--ink-soft);
}
footer a{ color:var(--teal-deep); }
@media (max-width:640px){
.track{ padding-left:22px; }
.entry::before{ left:-33px; width:22px; height:22px; font-size:.7rem; }
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="wrap">
<header class="hero">
<div class="eyebrow">Vibe Rounds · Cognitive Analytics Series</div>
<h1>Article Index: From First Principles to a Framework You'll Actually Use</h1>
<p class="dek">Four pieces, read in order, tracing the same idea — Promption and Provocation as cognitive modes for studying clinical cases — from a first working demonstration, through progressively heavier ground-truth tooling, to a deliberate step back toward something small enough to use every week.</p>
</header>
<main>
<div class="thesis-strip">Tooling, complexity, and claimed accuracy rise through Parts 1–3, then the series deliberately turns back toward usability in Part 4 — because a framework only teaches you something if you actually open it.</div>
<div class="track">
<div class="entry" data-num="1">
<div class="kicker">Part 1 · Foundation</div>
<div class="meta-row">
<span class="pill">2 cognitive modes</span>
<span class="pill">1 worked case</span>
<span class="pill">no ground-truth layer yet</span>
</div>
<h2><a href="https://avi33tbtt.github.io/modern_clinical_reasoning.html">Modern Clinical Reasoning & Socratic AI</a></h2>
<p>Introduces the dual-mode architecture — <strong>Promption</strong> (scaffolding messy narrative into structure) and <strong>Provocation</strong> (stress-testing the resulting hypothesis) — and walks a single DKA/pneumonia case through both modes end to end, surfacing an HbA1c discrepancy a single-pass answer would likely have missed.</p>
<div class="gauge">
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Tooling</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:22%"></div></div></div>
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Complexity</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:20%"></div></div></div>
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Ground truth</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:5%"></div></div></div>
</div>
<a class="read-link" href="https://avi33tbtt.github.io/modern_clinical_reasoning.html">Read Part 1 →</a>
</div>
<div class="entry" data-num="2">
<div class="kicker">Part 2 · Anchoring to ground truth</div>
<div class="meta-row">
<span class="pill">knowledge graph</span>
<span class="pill">institutional pathway</span>
<span class="pill">appraised evidence</span>
</div>
<h2><a href="https://avi33tbtt.github.io/ground_truth_layers.html">Fact Graphs, Pathways & Appraised Evidence</a></h2>
<p>Adds three structured layers on top of Part 1's cognitive modes — a chronic kidney disease knowledge graph, an acute pancreatitis institutional pathway, and appraised evidence — and examines what each one fixes, what new risk each one introduces, and why disagreement between layers is a signal worth surfacing rather than smoothing over.</p>
<div class="gauge">
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Tooling</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:55%"></div></div></div>
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Complexity</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:58%"></div></div></div>
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Ground truth</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:65%"></div></div></div>
</div>
<a class="read-link" href="https://avi33tbtt.github.io/ground_truth_layers.html">Read Part 2 →</a>
</div>
<div class="entry" data-num="3">
<div class="kicker">Part 3 · Weighting and validation</div>
<div class="meta-row">
<span class="pill">rarity-tiered weighting</span>
<span class="pill">EBM task axis</span>
<span class="pill">proposed empirical study</span>
</div>
<h2><a href="https://avi33tbtt.github.io/Case_Complexity.html">Weighting Ground-Truth Layers by Case Complexity</a></h2>
<p>Asks which layer deserves the most weight, for which case: a three-tier rarity framework crossed against an EBM task-complexity axis, a verification burden that rises with both, and an honest accounting of what remains a proof of concept versus what would need a matched case series to validate — plus a category of uncertainty, input curation, that no layer can ever reach.</p>
<div class="gauge">
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Tooling</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:88%"></div></div></div>
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Complexity</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:92%"></div></div></div>
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Ground truth</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:85%"></div></div></div>
</div>
<a class="read-link" href="https://avi33tbtt.github.io/Case_Complexity.html">Read Part 3 →</a>
</div>
<div class="entry mellow" data-num="4">
<div class="kicker">Part 4 · Turning back toward usability</div>
<div class="meta-row">
<span class="pill">10-minute self-audit loop</span>
<span class="pill">habits over tooling</span>
<span class="pill">deliberately smaller</span>
</div>
<h2><a href="https://avi33tbtt.github.io/using_the_stack.html">Using the Stack: A Practical Guide to Auditing Your Own Reasoning</a></h2>
<p>The deliberate turn. Rather than adding a fourth ground-truth layer, this piece asks what the smallest usable version of the whole stack looks like — a ten-minute weekly loop, a one-line ledger instead of a formal study, and a simple gut-check for when it's actually worth reaching for the graph, the pathway, or the evidence layer described in Parts 2 and 3.</p>
<div class="gauge">
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Tooling</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:15%"></div></div></div>
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Complexity</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:12%"></div></div></div>
<div class="gauge-row"><span class="gauge-label">Usability focus</span><div class="gauge-bar"><div class="gauge-fill" style="width:95%"></div></div></div>
</div>
<a class="read-link" href="https://avi33tbtt.github.io/using_the_stack.html">Read Part 4 →</a>
</div>
</div>
</main>
<footer>
<p>Vibe Rounds CCOS Framework · Cognitive Analytics Series · For Educational and Clinical Reasoning Practice Only — not a clinical decision tool.</p>
</footer>
</div>
</body>
</html>