Context
Task attribution derives a task from the file_written lines the run journal records. The journal reads a written path out of the host's own hook payload, and WRITTEN_PATH_EXTRACTOR_BY_HOST knows Claude Code's Write, Edit and NotebookEdit.
Found by
A live headless Claude Code session, run against the plugin loaded with --plugin-dir. Asked to create a file inside a task folder, the model did not use Write:
TOOL_USE: Bash {"command": "mkdir -p …/2026_08_21_live && printf 'probe' > …/notes.md"}
The journal recorded session_start and turn_end and no file_written. The session's tokens were measured in full — 77,412, verified by hand against the transcript — and it belongs to no task.
No fixture could have surfaced this: every captured payload in scripts/__tests__/fixtures uses the file tools, so every test asserted the path that does work.
Expected
A file written into a task folder is attributed to that task, however the tool chose to write it.
Actual
Bash carries a command string, not a path, so the write is invisible. The same is true of Codex, which writes through apply_patch — this is the same gap reaching a second tool.
Scope
- Whether a written path can be recovered from a shell command at all, and at what cost in false positives. A command mentioning a path is not a command that wrote it, and attributing on a mention would invent a task.
- Whether
PostToolUse offers anything better than the command string — a changed-files list, an exit status with paths.
- If neither: state it as a limit rather than closing it. It is already written down in
docs/telemetry-limits.md.
Not in scope: guessing. A task attributed from a path that merely appeared in a command is worse than no task.
Relations
Context
Task attribution derives a task from the
file_writtenlines the run journal records. The journal reads a written path out of the host's own hook payload, andWRITTEN_PATH_EXTRACTOR_BY_HOSTknows Claude Code'sWrite,EditandNotebookEdit.Found by
A live headless Claude Code session, run against the plugin loaded with
--plugin-dir. Asked to create a file inside a task folder, the model did not useWrite:The journal recorded
session_startandturn_endand nofile_written. The session's tokens were measured in full — 77,412, verified by hand against the transcript — and it belongs to no task.No fixture could have surfaced this: every captured payload in
scripts/__tests__/fixturesuses the file tools, so every test asserted the path that does work.Expected
A file written into a task folder is attributed to that task, however the tool chose to write it.
Actual
Bashcarries a command string, not a path, so the write is invisible. The same is true of Codex, which writes throughapply_patch— this is the same gap reaching a second tool.Scope
PostToolUseoffers anything better than the command string — a changed-files list, an exit status with paths.docs/telemetry-limits.md.Not in scope: guessing. A task attributed from a path that merely appeared in a command is worse than no task.
Relations