As a developer who has just installed AIDD telemetry
I want a skill that tells me, line by line, whether each link actually produces data
So that I never build a decision on figures an inert installation left incomplete
Acceptance
Expected output
enabled for this repository ok
plugin installed ok aidd-telemetry
hook observed ok last write 4 min ago
export configured ok OTLP to 127.0.0.1:4318
identifier joinable ok session.id present in the export
sessions journaled ok 12 over 7 days
step names readable FAIL OTEL_LOG_TOOL_DETAILS unset, steps collapse to third-party
not covered -- codex, copilot, cursor, opencode
Why a skill and not a CLI command
The diagnostic answers a question asked from inside a session, about the session that is running. A skill can read the run journal and see whether the current session has a file — which is precisely the "did the hook fire" check, and it is stronger from inside than from outside.
The CLI keeps one job only: turning the export on. Everything that reads belongs to the plugin.
Why this is the most important issue in the milestone
The measurement campaign (#632) found that no probe worked on the first attempt, and never for a different reason. Every tool gates its hooks differently. A hook installed without lifting the gate is silent and raises nothing.
That is not an edge case, it is the nominal case. Hence the central requirement: the skill does not check that a file exists, it checks that a hook fired.
Out of scope
- Per-tool inert-state detection for Codex, Copilot and Cursor. Those tools are out of scope for this milestone; naming them as uncovered is the correct answer, and parsing their trust state is days of work with no bearing on the promise.
- Any figure. Reading cost belongs to the consultation skill.
Relations
As a developer who has just installed AIDD telemetry
I want a skill that tells me, line by line, whether each link actually produces data
So that I never build a decision on figures an inert installation left incomplete
Acceptance
OTEL_METRICS_INCLUDE_SESSION_ID=falsecase.Expected output
Why a skill and not a CLI command
The diagnostic answers a question asked from inside a session, about the session that is running. A skill can read the run journal and see whether the current session has a file — which is precisely the "did the hook fire" check, and it is stronger from inside than from outside.
The CLI keeps one job only: turning the export on. Everything that reads belongs to the plugin.
Why this is the most important issue in the milestone
The measurement campaign (#632) found that no probe worked on the first attempt, and never for a different reason. Every tool gates its hooks differently. A hook installed without lifting the gate is silent and raises nothing.
That is not an edge case, it is the nominal case. Hence the central requirement: the skill does not check that a file exists, it checks that a hook fired.
Out of scope
Relations