Skip to content

Post-1.0 recurring distribution across agent marketplaces and directories #140

Description

@BaseInfinity

Goal

After the 1.0 harness release is certified, establish a recurring distribution program that makes the full Codex SDLC harness discoverable wherever supported agent workflows are credibly listed. This is broader than npm and broader than one plugin portal.

Present the product accurately as a Codex-first SDLC harness: installation and safe updates, repo-local lifecycle contracts, proof and review gates, guarded delivery, recovery, and release workflows. Do not undersell it as a small prompt or single skill.

Relationship to existing work

Recurring distribution cycle

Run this checklist after 1.0 and again after meaningful major capability, compatibility, packaging, or naming changes:

  • Inventory credible native marketplaces for every actually supported host.
  • Inventory reputable third-party plugin, skill, agent, workflow, and package directories.
  • Include Universal Agent Plugins as an initial candidate: https://github.com/777genius/universal-agent-plugins/blob/main/registry/README.md#submit-an-external-package
  • Record each candidate, owner, submission route, package format, trust level, maintenance activity, and supported hosts.
  • Confirm the canonical product name and repository after Rename wizard → harness, and inherit the checklist claude-sdlc-harness paid for #101; update or migrate older listings without creating competing identities.
  • Reuse one canonical release artifact and documentation contract; do not fork weaker marketplace-specific implementations.
  • Validate the exact published version on each claimed host before submission and after approval.
  • Keep Codex CLI canonical. Treat Desktop, Work, other agents, and portable formats as additive support that must be proven rather than assumed.
  • Publish accurate compatibility, install, update, support, privacy, license, and security information.
  • Capture listing URLs, submission status, screenshots/evidence, version, and last verification date.
  • Re-audit existing listings after major releases and periodically discover new credible directories.
  • Remove or correct stale, abandoned, misleading, duplicated, or unsafe listings.

Scope and safety

  • Submit only after 1.0 is released and the relevant host/package path is tested.
  • Favor maintained, transparent directories with review or validation over indiscriminate promotion.
  • Never claim compatibility merely because a package format is accepted.
  • No submission may weaken the CLI workflow, SDLC contract, safety gates, or update-preservation behavior.

Completion model

This issue intentionally stays open as the recurring distribution ledger until the project adopts a dedicated recurring tracker. Individual marketplace submissions may use linked child issues or checklists and close independently.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestresearchEvidence-gathering work that does not block the next release

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions