[FEATURE]: Centralized Weekly Progress Tracker & Contribution Matrix

[AbiramiR-27]

Feature and its Use Cases

Feature and its Use Cases
What is the feature?
An interactive "Weekly Progress Tracker" dashboard inside OrgExplorer. It will provide a matrix grid view showing a filtered subset of contributors along with a week-by-week chronological breakdown of their development activity (PRs opened, merged, closed, and issues raised).

How would users benefit from it?
Currently, organization mentors and GSoC contributors manually input and verify weekly contributions in a progress spreadsheet. Automating this within OrgExplorer will:

1. Save significant administrative time for mentors and students alike.
2. Provide a single, source-of-truth dashboard that reads directly from the GitHub API.
3. Automatically compute weekly metrics without manual entry errors.

What scenarios would this feature address?

• Mentor Evaluations: Mentors can easily check the week-by-week performance and velocity of all contributors in a single screen.
• Student Milestone Checks: Contributors can track their weekly progress to ensure they are meeting their target timelines.
• Sprint / Coding Window Audits: Allows checking activity patterns over standard weekly sprint intervals.

Additional Context

Proposed UI Design & Layout

• Filters: Select date range, start week configuration, and filter contributor lists (with an option to save filtered subsets like "GSoC 2026 Cohort").
• Matrix Grid:
  • Columns: Weeks (e.g., Week 1: May 18 - May 24, Week 2: May 25 - May 31).
  • Rows: Contributor usernames.
  • Cells: Aggregated badges showing active counts (e.g., 3 PRs / 1 Issue).
• Details Modal: Clicking on any cell opens a modal detail pane showing the titles, status, and direct GitHub links of all PRs/Issues submitted in that specific week.

Project References
Addresses the open item outlined in
FeatureWishlist.md

Code of Conduct

• I have joined the Discord server and will post updates there
• I have searched existing issues to avoid duplicates

[AbiramiR-27]

@Ri1tik @bhavik-mangla Raised this feature request as discussed in FeatureWishlist.md. Please review the proposed matrix grid design and let me know if I can go ahead with the implementation!